Contact

News & Insights

Voluntary tax fails to deliver

However, what the government may have failed to properly consider was that just as they are looking to balance the national books, Norway’s residents also have their own wealth management concerns – and making voluntary tax contributions can disrupt the financial plans even of high-net-worth individuals, particularly if they are in the process of pension or education fee planning.

However, it is probably fair to say that the Finance Ministry would have hoped to raise a little more money than it has so far; a sum that would not even be enough to buy a reliable second-hand car.

Perhaps the explanation for the modest haul is that many of Norway’s residents already pay a tax rate of 46.7 percent, and they are unlikely to feel they want to put Norway’s national wealth management concerns ahead of their own.

“The tax scheme was set up to allow those who want to pay more taxes to do so in a simple and straightforward way,” Norway’s Finance Minister Siv Jensen told press. “If anyone feels their tax level is too low, they now have the opportunity to pay more.”

It is probably pertinent that even Jonas Gahr Store, the wealthy leader of the left-of-centre Labor party, who was a leading critic of what he branded Norway’s unfairly low tax rates, has so far not opted to make any voluntary contributions under the government scheme.

The net result? It is thought that the scheme has cost considerably more to initiate than it has so far raised in voluntary contribution revenue. An unmitigated wealth management failure?

If you are an expat living in Norway and you feel you need some independent financial advice from experts who understand the system, please contact our wealth management team in Norway today.

This communication is for informational purposes only and is not intended to constitute, and should not be construed as, investment advice, investment recommendations or investment research. You should seek advice from a professional adviser before embarking on any financial planning activity. Whilst every effort has been made to ensure the information contained in this communication is correct, we are not responsible for any errors or omissions.

Other News

Saving for Education – Now is the Time to Act

School signPrivate school education offers many benefits outside of the obvious statistical performance advantages. As much as anything it is about allowing for personal growth, developing confidence, providing opportunity and building beneficial networks and skills that will last and serve for a lifetime.

But it can be expensive, and this is why intelligent use of expat regular savings together with a holistic wealth management strategy can help both parents and grandparents make the necessary plans to ensure that their descendants are able to enjoy a first-class education with only the minimum of stress.

Of course, the cost of fee-paying schools varies depending on which school is attended, whether the pupil is a boarder and, indeed, whether the pupil is living in the same country as its parents. But regardless of whether the cost is just €5,000 a year for a single pupil or €60,000 a year for two pupils, meeting these costs is going to require you to optimise your expat regular savings towards your education fee planning needs.

Read More

Surge in Britons becoming EU citizens

PassportFrom pension transfers into beneficial QROPS to careful tax planning, expats have a lot to consider so that they can be financially confident and live their life abroad to the fullest.

But with Brexit looming, there are other considerations afoot. For example, should expats keep their British citizenship or apply for nationality in their new expat homeland? And according to new statistics, it appears that the Brexit referendum result has had a significant effect on the number of Britons gaining citizenship elsewhere in the EU.

Figures from Eurostat, the EU’s statistics agency, show a substantial surge in the number of Britons acquiring citizenship in other EU countries between 2015 (2,478) and 2016, when the number more than doubled to 6,555 – that’s an increase of 165 percent. The figures include both those who chose to adopt dual citizenship, so that they kept their British citizenship, as well as those who renounced it.

Read More

Select your country

Please select your country of residence so we can provide you with the most relevant information: