Contact

News & Insights

Gibraltar will remain “100% British” says Fabian Picardo

Speaking to Sky News, Picardo made it clear that the Rock and its 30,000 inhabitants will not become the “victims of Brexit”, strongly opposing any notion that the territory, which has belonged to Britain since 1713, will be abandoned by the UK during negotiations. Gibraltar will remain “100% British” says Fabian Picardo.

Picardo’s confidence came from having received “cast-iron assurances” from the UK’s Secretary of State for Brexit, David Davis, that any trade deals made between the EU and the UK during talks would keep Gibraltar’s best interests in mind.

Picardo’s comments came just a few days after the King of Spain, Felipe VI, visited Westminster and, in a speech at the Palace of Westminster addressing the UK government, announced he wished for a new dialogue to start between the UK and Spain regarding “new arrangements” for Gibraltar.

The Rock’s sovereignty has always been seen to be an issue between Spain and the UK and it’s believed by many that Spain will always look for an opportunity to reclaim it. In his speech, King Felipe mentioned past “estrangements, rivalries and disputes”, but added that he was certain both countries could overcome their differences when it came to Gibraltar and that he hoped Brexit negotiations could lead to “arrangements that are acceptable to all involved”.

When asked by a Sky News presenter about the Spanish Monarch’s remarks, Picardo said that while there would have to be new arrangements to ensure continued fluid movement over the Gibraltar-Spain border (a large portion of Gibraltar’s workforce crosses the border from Spain, so if Brexit leads to any restrictions on border crossing, it could have disastrous results), nothing would be put in place to affect sovereignty:

The Rock “is going to remain 100% British”, the Chief Minister said. He reiterated that neither the Gibraltar government nor its citizens had any “desire to form part of Spain or to come under Spanish sovereignty in any shape or form”.

However, a clause included in the EU’s guidelines for Brexit negotiations – clause 24 – has raised the alarm for many Gibraltarians. The clause gives Spain the power to prevent any deal between the UK and the EU from also applying to Gibraltar. But Picardo was steadfast that the Gibraltar government would not stand for any unfairness, saying that Gibraltarians won’t accept the EU Council creating new rights for Spain and that “the British government is on record as saying that they won’t do a trade deal that excludes Gibraltar if it’s relevant to Gibraltar.”

“If we are not included because Spain and therefore the EU have managed to exclude us, that will mean failure on the part of the British negotiating team. And I bet on success, not on failure,” he added.

Keeping Gibraltar under British control would be honouring two previous sovereignty referendums held by the Rock – one in 1967 and one in 2002. The results of both referendums were conclusive. The result of the first saw 99.64% of Gibraltarians wanting their home to remain under wholly British rule, while the second saw 98.48% voting for the same. These were figures that Picardo drew upon during the interview. He said that if those involved are going to respect the UK’s EU referendum result, then the outcomes of the two Gibraltar sovereignty referendums must be given similar credence.

It’s still not known for sure what effect Brexit will have on the Rock and what problems it will cause for expats looking for Gibraltar wealth management services. For instance, if the UK leaves the EEA, this means Gibraltar will also leave, which could cause some difficulties for those hoping to transfer their pension into a QROPS based in Gibraltar.

Issues like this are why, when it comes to your finances, it helps to have a considerable amount of forward planning in place. Contacting a Blacktower adviser is an effective way of making sure your money is well-prepared for whatever the future has in store.

This communication is for informational purposes only and is not intended to constitute, and should not be construed as, investment advice, investment recommendations or investment research. You should seek advice from a professional adviser before embarking on any financial planning activity. Whilst every effort has been made to ensure the information contained in this communication is correct, we are not responsible for any errors or omissions.

Other News

Inflation – The Asset Eroding Thorn in your Low-risk Investment Strategy

Retired coupleBritish people are living longer than ever before – according to the Office of National Statistics, life expectancy is likely to rise to 85 by 2040. And this figure is an average; if you are physically healthy you can realistically expect to live one or more decades longer, particularly if you have a family history of longevity.

And what if you live abroad in a warm and agreeable climate? Well, chances are that your life expectancy could be even higher. This is good news of course, but it brings with it important expat wealth management and retirement planning implications.

Perhaps chief among these is the need to ensure that your retirement assets are sufficiently valuable to last you through a long and healthy old age, and this means making sure you factor in the likelihood of inflation eroding the purchasing power of your assets over time.

Read More

UK Pensions – Act Now!

CoinsHSBC and The Local Government Pension Scheme are the latest Defined Benefit Pension Schemes to cause upset and worry to thousands of soon-to-be retirees.

Firstly, HSBC has come under fire for cutting the pension payouts of its former staff by up to £2,500 a year, affecting 50,000 members who joined the company between 1975 and 1996. This group had opted to pay less national insurance (NI) contributions whilst working by “contracting out” of the former state pension scheme. This meant that HSBC also paid less NI contributions. In exchange for paying a lower rate, the bank agreed to pay staff a guaranteed minimum pension when they came to retire. Payment records were however not properly maintained leading pensioners to be either overpaid or underpaid. Numerous firms, including HSBC, had used this arrangement and when the errors were discovered, some began to cut pension payouts to compensate for the overpayment.  

Read More

Select your country

Please select your country of residence so we can provide you with the most relevant information: