Contact

News & Insights

What problems could a rising state pension age cause?

Currently, the earliest a state pension can be claimed is 65 for men and 63 for women (the exact age will depend on the date of birth). The state pensionable age for men and women is set to increase to 66 between October 2018 and October 2020. This will then rise to 67 between 2026 and 2028.

Plans are in place to then increase pension age once again to 68 in 2044. This means that the UK will have a higher state pension age than any other OECD country (Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development). The Government says it has no further plans to raise the age any higher than this, but former pensions minister Steve Webb, who originally found out about the “aggressive” changes to the state pension age by looking through documents produced by the Department for Work and Pensions, believes that it could potentially rise to 70.

But why must the pension age increase at all? The answer is simply that people are tending to live a lot longer, and the government needs to ensure that the system remains financially sustainable.

However, the problem with the eligible age rising like this, as the PSLA states, is that it will make life very difficult for two groups: people who have a lower than average life expectancy (and who will therefore receive hardly any state pension) and those who struggle to stay in work before they reach the pension age because of poor health. This can be viewed as discrimination to poorer areas of the country, as people from less prosperous areas are more likely to suffer ill health earlier than those in more affluent areas.

In order to retain fairness for all UK citizens who have worked their entire lives and deserve a sufficient retirement fund, the PSLA has recommended replacement of the triple lock system – a system put in place under David Cameron to ensure that state pension amounts rise annually in line with inflation – with indexation in line with earnings. This will allow the state pension to maintain its current value of roughly 30 per cent of the average earnings.

As the director of external affairs for the PSLA, Graham Vidler, stated, “We believe the fairest approach for current and future generations of pensioners is to drop the triple lock and halt further increases in state pension age. A state pension maintained at 30% of average earnings can provide a strong basis for future retirement incomes.”

Explaining the reasoning behind the suggestion, Vidler said, “Removing the triple lock can keep [the state pension scheme] affordable without the need to increase state pension age still further to the detriment of people with poorer health.”

Vidler also opposed the idea suggested by some pension experts to have a variable pension age, saying that it would “sacrifice the simplicity and clarity of the current system”.

No matter how the state pension age may change, proper wealth management is key. It’s never too early to start planning your pension, and Blacktower can advise you every step of the way. From international pension planning advice to offering expat financial services, such as how to set up a QROPS (qualifying recognised overseas pension scheme), we can help you get all your finances in check so you are well prepared for the future.

This communication is for informational purposes only and is not intended to constitute, and should not be construed as, investment advice, investment recommendations or investment research. You should seek advice from a professional adviser before embarking on any financial planning activity. Whilst every effort has been made to ensure the information contained in this communication is correct, we are not responsible for any errors or omissions.

Other News

Expats can appeal EU Referendum Act decision

Ballot BoxGood news for British expats who are hoping to prove that the EU Referendum Act 2015 unfairly discriminates against them and their decision to exercise their right to freedom of movement in the EU; they have won the right to launch an urgent appeal against the decision to not grant them a vote in the European Union referendum.

The move comes after Lord Justice Lloyd Jones, sitting with Mr Justice Blake at the High Court in London, earlier ruled that section 2 of the Act did not restrict their rights.

The appeal, which is being led by two British expats, is motivated by a desire to prevent Brexit; an event which would unduly affect the lives of the two million British expats who, should Britain leave the EU, face the possibility of having their lives severely disrupted, together with their plans for their expat regular savings. In fact, according to lawyers representing the expats, they face becoming “resident aliens”.

Read More

Safeguarding your Pension and Assets

Many UK expatriates do not realise that even if they have left and are no longer resident in the UK, they remain UK-domiciled and therefore subject to UK Inheritance Tax (IHT) on their worldwide estate at a rate of 40 per cent after allowances. This can come as a major shock. 

Brexit

What can be done about this? There are several options. 

Transfers of wealth on death between husband and wife are exempt from IHT, but only if the spouse is also domiciled in the UK (or both are non-domiciled). This catches out many expatriates who have married a foreign passport holder who is likely to be domiciled elsewhere. Even then, the IHT is only delayed rather than avoided, because on the death of the survivor the tax will be payable on the passing of the family assets to the next generation. 

Read More

Select your country

Please select your country of residence so we can provide you with the most relevant information: